military and diplomatic apparatus should think carefully about whether to deploy these systems again in situations as tenuous as Afghanistan.” “I don’t think anyone ever thought about data privacy or what to do in the event the system fell into the wrong hands,” said Welton Chang, chief technology officer for Human Rights First, himself a former Army intelligence officer. According to investigative reporter Annie Jacobsen, the Pentagon had a goal to gather biometric data on 80 percent of the Afghan population to locate terrorists and criminals. military has long used HIIDE devices in the global war on terror and used biometrics to help identify Osama bin Laden during the 2011 raid on his Pakistani hideout. The ISI has been known to work closely with the Taliban. “The Taliban doesn’t have the gear to use the data but the ISI do,” the former Special Operations official said, referring to Pakistan’s spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence. “ was used as a biometric ID tool to help ID locals working for the coalition.”Ī spokesperson for the Defense Intelligence Agency referred questions to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, which did not respond to a request for comment.Īn Army Special Operations veteran said it’s possible that the Taliban may need additional tools to process the HIIDE data but expressed concerns that Pakistan would assist with this. “We processed thousands of locals a day, had to ID, sweep for suicide vests, weapons, intel gathering, etc.” a U.S. was also widely collected and used in identification cards, sources said. military as a means of tracking terrorists and other insurgents, biometric data on Afghans who assisted the U.S. For Gmail, I have an entire Gmail help library, but please do check out the site to find lots of helpful tutorials on just about any Google property you can name! Thanks.While billed by the U.S. #Sources hiide proPro Tip: Google has a huge variety of online services and I’ve written about just about all of them. You’re now a power Google News user, congratulations. To unhide and restore a news source, simply click on the red circle adjacent. A click on “Manage” and you’ll see every source you’ve hidden since you started using Google News: You can view your own activity or you can see a list of Hidden sources. A click on “ Settings” brings up the rather minimalist set of options for this helpful service: #Sources hiide androidThere’s both an iPhone and Android app that lets you keep up with the latest from Google News, as you can see, and you can switch languages if that’s your preference. Settings? Yup, Google News has some basic settings that you can access from the lower left of the Gnews page: #Sources hiide how toIf the sports section is all NHL all the time and you just don’t care about hockey, that’s how to fix it up.Ĭhoose “Hide all stories” from a source and a confirmation message will flash up on the lower left of the page for just a few seconds: But notice you can also tune the Gnews algorithm to give you more or less stories on a specific theme. Obviously, “Hide all stories from Forbes” will allow me to regain my equilibrium, so it’s probably a good idea. Or, in the lingo of a Forbes headline, “CNN and Fox News Panic About Incredibly Powerful Google News Feature” □ Here’s what you might not realize if you are a fan of Google News: If you move the cursor adjacent to a headline, additional options appear, one of which is a menu that lets you fine-tune this source. Here’s how…įirst off, here’s a typical alarmist, vastly overblown headline in Gnews: But this is Gnews, so it means I can filter Forbes out of my news stream entirely. A great publication with solid writing – heck, I have friends on their editorial staff – but I just can’t express how strongly I loath their clickbait headlines. In some cases, sticking with those sources might help you expand your perspective a bit (at least ideally), but other times, well, it’s just gotta go. Sometimes it’s because of their headlines, but often it’s because their spin on the news is just too far out of your own comfort zone or preferences or worldview. The same story might show headlines from Al Jazeera, the South China Morning Post, CNBC, AllAfrica and CNN, making it a really good way to see how different sources cover the same story with a different bias or skew.Įxcept when there’s a news source that you don’t like. Gnews, as it’s known, scours hundreds of disparate news sources from around the world to identify rising hot stories and offer a variety of perspectives. If you’re used to just reading a single news source like the New York Times, Washington Post or Fox News, you’ve been missing out on one of Google’s more interesting Web sites: Google News.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |